Ogólne rozporządzenie o ochronie danych. Aktualne problemy prawnej ochrony danych osobowych 2016 - Wprowadzenie (dodatek MoP 20/2016)

Challenges faced by data protection officers (data protection inspectors) in connection with the coming into force of the General Data Protection Regulation

The reform of the European personal data protection law from the viewpoint of citizens’ rights – more or less protection?

The admissible scope of Polish personal data protection regulations after the General Data Protection Regulation becomes effective – selected issues

Territorial scope vs the notion of “establishment” in the provisions of the General Data Protection Regulation – outline

The requirement of data processing impact assessment in the General Data Protection Regulation

Contractual transfer of personal data for processing in the Polish Personal Data Protection Act, Directive 95/46 and the General Data Protection Regulation

Reporting personal data protection infringements in the light of the General Data Protection Regulation

Personal data profiling under the General Data Protection Regulation – the existing and prospective legal situation in the EU and in Poland

Data protection by design and data protection by default in the General Data Protection Regulation

Total recall of controlled amnesia – selected legal problems of “the right to be forgotten” in the General Data Protection Regulation

The principles of personal data transfers to third countries in the General Data Protection Regulation

Data protection officer and data protection inspector - comparison of the appointment criteria, status and responsibilities

Contract for renovation of buildings or structures (Art. 658 of the Civil Code)

Statement of reasons for a judgment of a court a quo in the light of amended provisions of the Code of Penal Procedure

Resolution of civil disputes by way of mediation in the light of the amendment to the Code of Civil Procedure of 10 September 2015

The duty to make the contents of websites accessible by people with impaired vision

Gloss on the judgement of the Supreme Court of 17 September 2008, court file No. III CSK 119/08 (the members of the consortium agreement are jointly and severally liable for the execution of the agreement with sub – contractor).