Abstract

In this commentary the author critically evaluates the thesis of the resolution of the Disciplinary Chamber of the Supreme Court of 27 November 2019, II DSI 67/18, according to which “In the disciplinary proceedings against advocates Art. 521 of the Code of Civil Procedure shall apply to the decisions of the disciplinary court for advocated”. The author draws attention to of the erroneous wording of this thesis, incorrect legal identification of the Minister of Justice and the Prosecutor General, as well as substantive baselessness of this position.