Monitor Prawniczy
no. 9/2024
Impact of new regulations on the risks of entering into business relationships with cryptoasset service providers
DOI: 10.32027/MOP.24.9.17
Autor jest prawnikiem, Junior Associate w praktyce Finansowań i Regulacji Finansowych kancelarii Bird & Bird Szepietowski i wspólnicy sp.k.
Autor jest prawnikiem, Associate w praktyce Finansowań i Regulacji Finansowych kancelarii Bird & Bird Szepietowski i wspólnicy sp.k.
Abstract
The article concerns the issue of cryptoasset service providers (CASPs) entering into business relationships with financial institutions which have the status of the obliged institutions under the applicable AML/CFT regulations.
The authors analyses the current state of the law and its implications for cryptoasset market players. The analysis draws attention to the previous perception of cryptoasset market entities as being at risk of money laundering or terrorist financing.
Subsequently, the article outlines how the new legislation regulates cryptoasset market entities, thereby reducing the AML/CFT risks associated therewith. In the authors’ view, de lege lata, there are no valid reasons for financial institutions to refuse entering into business relationships with CASPs.
Keywords
cryptoassets, MiCA, AML, ToF, CASP
Literature
F. Annunziata, An overview of the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCAR), EBI Working Paper Series, 2023 r., Nr 158; K. Dygaszkiewicz, Komentarz do ustawy o przeciwdziałaniu praniu pieniędzy oraz finansowaniu terroryzmu [w:] Prawo obrotu pieniężnego. Komentarz, pod red. P. Zapadki, Warszawa 2023; I. Kasasek-Wojciechowicz, Reconciliation of anti-money laundering instruments and European data protection requirements in permissionless blockchain spaces, „Journal of Cybersecurity” Nr 1/2021; M. Lehmann, MiCAR - Gold Stanrdard or Regulatory Poison for the Crypto Industry?, „EBI Working Papers Series” Nr 160/2024; D.A. Zetsche, D.W. Arner, R.P. Buckey, Decentralized Finance, „Journal of Financial Regulation” Nr 6/2020.