In conclusion, there is the last point that needs to be stressed. Regarding the introduction of intermediate categories, the usual question is whether a third (intermediate) group, when redefined according to the criteria used in German law, can be a helpful strategy to extend certain protective rights to employees working in the gig economy. The idea that the third category can be used as a panacea for all ills is to be excluded. In fact, adding a third category could be seen as a mere means for further eroding the protection enjoyed by employees and „would only increase the amount of arbitrage. Three categories create more room for mischief than two”.