Monitor Prawniczy

no. 3/2025

Corporate law in Germany

Martin Wittmann
Autor jest partnerem w Deloitte Legal Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, gdzie współprowadzi zespół Line Dispute Resolution. Świadczy kompleksowe doradztwo na rzecz krajowych i międzynarodowych podmiotów w zakresie prawa korporacyjnego, fuzji i przejęć, joint venture oraz reorganizacji. Członek VGR (Wissenschaftliche Vereinigung für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht e.V.), prawnik specjalizujący się w prawie bankowym i prawie rynków kapitałowych; wykładowca w Szkole Prawa Niemieckiego Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
Abstract

In German law, corporations are governed by the Stock Corporation Act (Aktiengesetz). There are three types of corporations, namely contractual corporations (Vertragskonzern), integrated corporations (Eingliederungskonzern) and factual corporations (faktischer Konzern). An important question is the issuing of instructions by the controlling company. According to the overwhelming majority of views in the doctrine, the controlling company should not be obliged to issue instructions, but is entitled to do so with respect to the management of the company under the Stock Corporation Act. It is also permissible to issue unfavourable instructions if it serves the interests of the controlling company or entities participating in the group. If an instruction is permissible, the Management Board of the controlled company is obliged to execute the instruction, even if it is unfavourable. The right to issue instructions is subject to restrictions resulting from the articles, statutory regulations, the need to ensure future continued existence of the company, as well as permissibility of the instruction. Within the corporation, responsible the controlled company are representatives of the controlling company, as well as members of the Management Board and Supervisory Board of the controlled company, unless they have acted in accordance with a binding instruction. As regards the possibility of influencing a controlled company, the German legislator has introduced regulations aimed at protecting the controlled company, its minority shareholders and creditors. In accordance with those provisions, the controlling company must not use its power to induce the controlled company to perform a legal action that is unfavourable to it and to take or refrain from actions unfavourable to it, unless the resulting negative effects are remedied.

Keywords
corporate law, corporation, group of companies, binding instruction
Literature

H. Altmeppen, Münchener Kommentar zum Aktiengesetz, 2023; W. Bayer, Münchener Kommentar zum Aktiengesetz, 2024; V. Emmerich, M. Habersack, Konzernrecht, 2023; H. Fleischer, Großkommentar AktG, 2020; M. Habersack [w:] Aktien- und GmbH-Konzernrecht, red. V. Emmerich, M. Habersack, 2022; P. Hommelhoff, Die Konzernleitungs­pflicht - Zentrale Aspekte eines Konzernverfassungsrechts, 1982; J. Koch, Aktiengesetz, 2024; H.-G. Koppensteiner, Kölner Kommentar zum Aktiengesetz, 2020; B. Kropff, Aktiengesetz, 1965; S. Kubis, Münchener Kommentar zum Aktiengesetz, 2022; M. Lutter, Stand und Entwicklung des Konzernrechts in Europa, ZGR 1987; H.-F. Müller, beck-online.GROSSKOMMENTAR Akitengesetz, 2024; A. Schall, beck-online.GROSSKOMMENTAR Akitengesetz, 2023; U.H. Schneider, Konzernleitung als Rechtsproblem, BB 1981; U.H. Schneider, Vorstandshaftung im Konzern, AG 2005; G. Spindler, K. Schmidt, M. Lutter, Aktiengesetz Kommentar, 2020; R. Veil, F. Wall, beck-online.GROSSKOMMENTAR Akitengesetz, 2024; R. Veil, F. Wall, beck-online.GROSSKOMMENTAR Akitengesetz; J. Vetter, K. Schmidt, M. Lutter, Aktiengesetz Kommentar, 2020.