Abstract
The article discusses the latest judgments of the Supreme Court regarding the question of determining the value of the object of litigation in suits against enforcement. Divergent opinions have been held by courts and jurisprudence as to whether this value should include interest, costs and other accessory performances adjudicated alongside the principal claim. In its judgement of 26 April 2024, II CSKP 811/22, the Supreme Court opposed such a possibility. From the viewpoint of practice, guidance contained in the statement of reasons with regard to determining the value of the object of litigation aimed at limiting or cancelling enforceability of a writ of execution may prove relevant.