Abstract

The article examines the criteria used to assess the quality of the decisions of the judicial authorities in pre-contractual public procurement disputes. It discusses aspects such as the uniformity of jurisprudence, the fairness of judgments, the stability of jurisprudence and the speed of the adjudicating procedure before the National Appeals Chamber and the common courts. The article looks at current regulations as well as regulations introduced under the new Public Procurement Law of 11 September 2019. It also contains proposals for changes that may contribute to improving the quality of adjudication and increase the effectiveness of legal remedies within public procurement system.