Monitor Prawniczy

no. 6/2022

Prohibitive motions in proceedings for securing a claim and securing evidence

DOI: 10.32027/MOP.22.6.1
Jarosław R. Antoniuk
Autor jest sędzią orzekającym w Sądzie Okręgowym w Katowicach, Przewodniczącym XXIV Wydziału Własności Intelektualnej, adiunktem w Katedrze Zarządzania na Wydziale Organizacji i Zarządzania Politechniki Śląskiej w Gliwicach; ORCID: 0000-0002-3109-2564.
Abstract

The article is devoted to admissibility of filing prohibitive motions by obligors during the proceedings for securing a claim and securing evidence. Basing on the analysis of the current court practice in this respect, the author distinguishes four models of dealing with prohibitive motions advocating the one that leaves the decision as to whether to allow a party to submit a prohibitive motion to the presiding judge of the court hearing the application. The author of the article, noticing the lack of relevant provisions in the Polish civil procedure, formulates proposals for introducing regulations allowing the use of prohibitive motions in proceedings for securing claims in intellectual property cases and for securing evidence.