Abstract

Art. 1046 of the Code of Civil Procedure described the principles and method of vacating residential premises; it does not apply to enforcement related to vacating temporary premises which has been made available to the debtor as a result of original enforcement against that debtor. Temporary premises are seized under an agreement between the debtor and the municipality rather than the debtor and the original creditor. Eviction from temporary premises must not be treated as a subsequent step in enforcement of the originally vacated residence, but it should be based exclusively on a new (additional) court order.