Abstract

The glosses resolution concerns permissibility of granting authorization to a member of the management board of a limited liability company. This is yet a successive Supreme Court statement on this subject. Although the main considerations of the bench refer exclusively to a specific power of attorney, the arguments cited by the Supreme Court in the statement of the grounds refer to powers of attorney in general. The thesis of the resolution allowing for granting a specific power of attorney to a member of the management board deserves full approval, though certain arguments citted in the statement of the grounds call for criticism.